Diploma progress

In January I stated my intention (see Fantasy Piano Recital) to prepare for an ABRSM diploma, and the five months since then has been the most amazing journey of discovery for me. Not all of it good, it has to be said, but a learning experience which has been hugely worthwhile. Some random observations…

My family have more or less banned me from practising at home, and my 11 year old son can sing my entire 35 minute recital note-perfect from beginning to end! I have always loved practising, and it is fair to say that this project has brought out some of my more obsessional qualities! However, I don’t think it’s all bad news; as a father, I guess I have been modelling commitment and perseverance to my four sons, and indeed in the last week my eldest (aged 17) has decided that he wants to apply to the Royal College of Music next year! And so the cycle continues….!

Apart from the Stravinsky, which I wrestled with largely unsuccessfully as a teenager, all of this repertoire was new to me in January, and I set out with the intention of integrating the memory aspect from the very beginning. In other words, rather than learning the notes and then working out how to memorise them, I deliberately set out to commit short passages to memory from the outset. The result has been that over the past few months I have spent more and more time practising with no music in front of me at all, to the extent that it has become entirely normal not to have it there.

Some parts of the repertoire have been much more difficult to memorise than others. The Schubert, for instance, is physically very ‘samey’ throughout, and the obscure key does not help – looking down, my eyes say B major, but the score says C flat major! And in the slow movement of the Beethoven it has been equally difficult to remember the subtle differences between very similar sections. On the other hand, some of the more technical passages (sequences in Bach and scales and arpeggios in Beethoven and Fauré) have been surprisingly easy to memorise, especially once the basic harmonic plan of the section has been established. The Stravinsky is so physical that actually the muscle memory seems to remain the most reliable method.

Whatever the methods, over the course of the past few weeks the entire programme has fallen into place, in as much as I have been able to play from beginning to end with increasing confidence, and certainly with no need to look at the scores. If anything, I have needed to make a concerted effort to open the music to check details of dynamics and phrasing as it has been months now since I have even looked at the dots!

The freedom gained has been truly wonderful. I have spent a great deal of time with a rather wonderful Steinway grand piano, and whereas in the past I have been content to sit at a closed piano and play the notes in front of me, I now open the lid and even remove the music desk so that I can hear the instrument more clearly; I listen more carefully. And now that the eyes are free, there are so many things to look at, to concentrate on. Fingers, fingers reflected in the fallboard, hammers hitting the strings, beautiful aesthetics of a fine concert hall, or nothing at all – eyes closed. I’ve experimented with them all, and the different focus which each one brings has been such an enjoyable experience.

Being without music has certainly sharpened my senses. Physically, I am now much more at liberty to see what I am doing with my fingers; watching the weight of the right hand little finger in the Schubert Impromptu makes such a difference to my focus. But this in nothing compared with how much the ear is switched on to sound!

So with less than a month to go, I took the plunge on Tuesday evening and performed to a real audience, my first solo piano recital in 26 years! I am an extremely experienced performer as organist, piano accompanist and conductor, but the single element under scrutiny here was whether my memory could cope with the additional strain of nerves. Getting fired up and excited about playing in a match can be hugely beneficial, but it is perhaps less helpful when you need to retain a vast amount of highly refined detail for a sustained period! The outcome – I really didn’t enjoy one moment of it, since I spent the whole time thinking “Don’t forget it, you’re going to forget it” and barely any making music. A schoolboy error? Yes!!

Not all is lost though, quite the opposite in fact. I think it was a necessary experience, and apart from anything else it has realigned my focus significantly. For although my own self-imposed target (not required for the exam) is to play from memory, the exam itself is neither a piano diploma nor a memory diploma – it is a performance diploma. Time to stop stressing about the memory and move on and up to the next level.

The other outcome is that this was a brilliant learning experience, not only for me but also for my willing audience, made up for members of the choral society and a few school colleagues and pupils. As a teacher, I think it is vitally important that they should see that I am still learning, and moreover that I am not afraid to show them that learning is not always easy. As ever, although the exam day looms larger and I want to do the very best that I can on the day, the process has been transformational, and will bear fruit long after the outcome (pass or fail?!) has faded.

Aural tests – just sing!

I have discovered the most wonderful resource for musicianship training – canonsSo much can be covered with the simplest of four bar canons, and perhaps the greatest beauty of all is that you need nothing more than two voices.

Take the following example:

canon3

 

The first objective should be to sight-sing the melody using solfa. I insist that my pupils do this, for two reasons. Firstly, it gives each note its place value in the key. And secondly, it is extremely focusing to be thinking about both pitch and syllable  – there is no room for passive participation here! Initially even a simple melody may prove quite testing, but this active engagement of the brain, this constant thinking ahead, is an excellent skill to be developing right alongside the aural skills.

Alternatively, or perhaps after an initial attempt at sight-singing, you can learn to sing it from memory, perhaps in two halves at first, but still using solfa.

With a more able pupil, you might dive in straight away and ask them to sing after you, in canon. This allows them either to read the notes as they sing, or else to memorize what you sung and follow that way – or ideally a combination of both. Still in solfa. They might get the notes right but a few syllables wrong – don’t allow them to get off lightly! Even if they get the melody perfectly correct, insist that the solfa is correct too, even if it takes a few more attempts.

And then there are the hand signs! These can be introduced whilst you are just singing in unison, and your pupil should sign too. The ultimate test, of course, is to sing the canon whilst signing the second part a bar later. But be warned, make sure you have practised this before you demonstrate in front of your pupil – it’s not easy!

A quick glance down the aural test requirements for the early ABRSM grades will show you just how much a little of the above covers:

  • Pulse. Singing together and in canon enhances an awareness of both rhythm and pulse.
  • Echo responses. Memorizing short phrases.
  • Recognising changes. Singing in canon requires careful listening to both rhythm and pitch, and students will soon be identifing their own errors.
  • Sight-singing notes in free time (Grades 4 & 5). The key here is solfa, and learning a few tuneful canons in this way will soon make the ABRSM tests seem insultingly easy.
  • Sing back a phrase. No problem – your student can now sing back a phrase at the same time as listening to how it continues!
  • Tonality. The place value which solfa brings (you just can’t sing mi without having worked out that it is the 3rd of the chord) is excellent for developing a sense of key, and singing in canon also encourages the student to listen carefully to the harmonies produced between the voices.
  • Singing back the lower/upper part. Once you have practised a few example, see whether your pupil can sing in canon without sight of the music; this really does develop their ability to hear one part and sing another.

I find teaching the ABRSM tests in order to pass the exam to be a pretty painful experience – but just learning and singing together a simple canon, even for a few minutes each lesson, is quite the opposite. Delightfully pure and simple, but incredibly focusing for both pupil and teacher alike. Let’s put the instrument down, or step away from the piano for a few moments, and sing!

This canon is the very first in a book of 109 canons selected by David Vinden in ‘Two-part hearing development” which is available here.

Plus …. a fab solfa video here!

As easy as do re mi? A “beginner’s” guide to solfa

For as long as I can remember I have been able to sight-sing with confidence, doubtless due to my early training as a chorister and subsequent involvement with choirs for many years since. It still remains, for me, the most important thing for any musician – to be able to sing.

Three years ago I signed up for a British Kodàly Academy Spring Course. I can’t quite remember why, but one of the things which did interest me was the knowledge that the Kodàly approach uses solfège, the naming of each note of the scale as do, re, mi, fa, so, la, ti, do. I was interested to see whether there was anything in it, since I had my doubts – after all, I could sight-sing perfectly adequately without, so what possible use could giving all the notes funny names be to me? As I soon discovered, I was missing the point.

The first event of Day One was choir. We learned a song from memory by repeating back phrases sung by our director, which was challenging for one reason only – we were expected to sing in solfa! For me pitching the notes was easy, but remembering which solfa name to sing them to was not, and immediately I found my brain racing to keep up. And it was relentless! Just as I thought I had the hang of it, we cut to something different – learning another melody, or clapping and/or stamping a complex syncopated rhythm. And then (I should have seen it coming!) we put all of them together; melody, rhythm, others singing the countermelody, and the solfa! By the time the hour was up I felt like I’d done a day’s mental workout. They say that music uses both sides of the brain – definitely!

HandSigns

And then on to musicianship training. I was aware that there are different hand signs for each of the solfa syllables, but was not yet aware of their full potential. We learned some relatively simple pentatonic melodies from memory, and again the most difficult element was singing the solfa names. By now I realised that I was becoming much more actively aware of the relative position of each note in the scale, rather than just pitching each note from the previous one. The latter system still worked for the pitch, of course, just not for the name. Interesting. And then we were asked to perform a melody in canon. First at the piano; play first, and start singing a bar later (in solfa). Challenging, but manageable, and I have to say I felt very proud of myself for negotiating the task successfully, albeit with my brain running at full tilt. And then with hand signs. That’s right, sing first (in solfa) and then sign the canon a bar later with the solfa hand signs. “You’ve got to be joking” I said to Klara, the delightful Hungarian lady who was taking our class. Evidently she wasn’t. As encouragement, she performed the canon in three parts, using both hands, without even breaking a sweat! Respect.

Back in choir, I soon discovered that when the music changes key, do moves too – and so of course does everything else! Never before have I been so intensely aware of the place value of each note in a melody, and in observing every modulation as it occurs. I realised that much of the time I sight-sing on autopilot; yes, I am constantly listening, but perhaps not always thinking so hard. On the other hand, solfa actively forces you to listen and to analyse, and the intensity of this experience is actually very surprising. It is an amazingly powerful tool for teaching complete novices (as my Choir who can’t sing will testify) right through to analysing Schubert symphonies in detail, which I did on this year’s Spring Course.

This approach to musicianship is so refreshingly rigorous, and I love it!

Singing for pianists

The third of my five ‘E’s for outstanding instrumental teaching is developing an Enquiring mind. I think that it is vital that the teacher gets into the habit of asking questions rather than answering them, so that the student quickly learns that he is expected to work things out for himself. A simple example: “don’t forget the E flat in bar 5” becomes “which note did you play wrong in bar 5?” It is so easy to fall into the trap of giving the answers, but telling is not teaching and we should not be in so much of a hurry to teach a piece of music that we forget to teach the student.

Assuming the student answered the question correctly, let’s make the next question a little more difficult: “Can you sing me the E flat please?” At this point, in 9 out of 10 cases, the student will reach for an E flat on the piano – if they get the chance that is, because I’m ready for them! “No, don’t play it, sing it.” For me, this really gets to the crux of the problem. Sitting at a piano is like having a calculator in an arithmetic exam, but easier; if you want to know an answer, just press the relevant key and the answer is immediate.

At the simplest level, this is going to test the student’s aural memory. Can they remember, in their inner ear, any of the notes which they have been playing in the last few moments? The questions which they need to ask themselves are going to be the equivalent of a mathematician showing how they reached the answer – if they think that you are just expecting them to pull an E flat out of the air then of course they have every reason to panic!

A few more leading questions might help; “The phrase started on a B flat, can you remember what that sounded like? Yes? Well, can you sing me a B flat then?” Once they have sung the B flat, a little theory might be required: “How far away is E flat from B flat? Ok, sing up a four note scale from the B flat and we should get there!”

My piano pupils are used to this type of questioning, resigned to it perhaps! They realise that I am serious, however, and although in the early days some will just dig their heels in and refuse to sing – I had a pupil once who took weeks and weeks even to pluck up the courage to proffer a single squeak – they all know that it is an expectation. The benefit, of course, is that they are using their ears, and they soon realise that it can be quite helpful to have their ears connected up with what their fingers are doing.

This style of teaching encourages the student to use their brain, their memory, their ears, their knowledge of theory, their voice …. and sometimes diversionary tactics! The alternative “don’t forget the E flat in bar 5” seems unhelpful in comparison.

Effective practice – a must read!

I have recently discovered this amazing blog post, entitled How many hours a day should you practise? by ‘The Bulletproof Musician’ which encapsulates everything that I think it important to appreciate about how to practise effectively. Particularly good sections entitled Mindless and Deliberate practice. More eloquently put than I could ever manage, and a must read for any student, parent or teacher.

Musicianship

I think of myself more as a musician who plays the piano, rather than a pianist. I’m more interested in the music itself than the mechanics of it.   Martin Roscoe                                                            

I was delighted to hear Martin Roscoe say this in a recent interview, since it mirrors almost exactly my own sentiments when it comes to teaching. A quote from a blog post of mine from just a few months ago:

I find it very helpful to think of myself first and foremost as a music teacher, but one who just happens to teach that musicianship through the piano.

Sadly, unlike Martin I don’t think that I will ever reach the point where I will be able to let the ‘mechanics’ of playing the piano take care of themselves! But let’s get back down to earth and summarise:

It’s about the music.

A good proportion of my piano teaching is concerned with forming a solid technique. The purpose of the technique is to serve the music effectively, so that the pianist is able to express their intentions at whatever level they happen to be performing. I am also passionate about the mechanics of learning, and in particular in how to transfer the skills necessary for a pupil to become self-sufficient.

But what happens if the student just isn’t very musical? The answer is stunningly obvious  – we need to draw out their musicianship. I really can’t see the point of teaching the mechanics if the musicianship is neglected, since the student will have nothing to communicate if they have no musical understanding. And yet I find myself, on a daily basis, encountering young musicians who are ploughing through the ABRSM/Trinity grades with little understanding of the music which they are playing because the focus is too much on the mechanics, and not enough on the music itself. I am not talking about instructing pupils how to play musically. No, it is about drawing out an understanding so that they know for themselves how to play musically. The difference is vast.

Since coming to Monkton some three and a half years ago I have done a lot of work with ‘non-musicians’. The tone deaf project and The Choir who can’t sing are clear indications to me that to write off the ‘non-musician’ is a serious mistake. I am also convinced that the way forward is to train the musician first, because this the the bit which lasts. In order to do this, the focus needs to be on musical things – aural skills and inner hearing, understanding the implications of harmonic progressions etc. If that means going a little slower with repertoire in order to further the musicianship of the pupil, that shouldn’t be a problem!

How much can you achieve in half an hour?

My first piano teacher, Ethel May, was a little old lady who lived on the other side of town. She had a fine reputation as a teacher, and I suspect that a large part of the success of her pupils was due quite simply to her expectations when it came to practising; when she took me on, aged six, it was on the clear understanding that she would only teach me if I practised for half an hour every day.

I am reliably informed (by my former practice coach – thanks Mum!) that I used to do my practice in two 15 minute sessions every day. Thinking back to my first piano book, and those first few simple pieces (with thumbs always over middle C) I am struck by how much I must have been able to achieve on 3 hours a week! With that amount of time, I must have arrived at each lesson having played those little pieces hundreds of times, with time to spare to lovingly choreograph each finger movement, and doubtless to memorise the notes too. I really don’t remember, but I suspect that by mid-week I must have been ready to turn a few more pages and forge ahead by myself, having had more than enough time to master the work set.

Many years on, I have never found it too difficult to guess how much practice my pupils have (or haven’t) done each week. There are lots of clues, ranging from seeing the music falling open to the right page – in contrast to the pupil not even knowing which page their piece is on – to noting whether they can start playing straight away or whether they have to work out what the notes in the first chord are before they can even start!

What I am completely confident about, however, is that half an hour a week is not enough. For anyone learning any instrument at any level. After the lesson which I taught this morning, I am confident that my pupil (working towards Grade 7) has all that she needs in the understanding and technique departments to completely master the passage which we were working on; the only other component which now needs to be thrown into the mix is Time. If she spends half an hour every day on it, she will know every little moment – the note which she always forgets (D flat!), the differing chord weighting required in the right hand accompaniment, the left hand chord sequence and associated finger patterns – she can’t fail to. But on half an hour a week (that’s just five minutes a day) she might have had a chance to play through the passage a few times, but the familiarity will simply not come in that time. Time and practice is what is needed.

In a busy boarding school environment, I think it’s probably quite easy to slip into the “she’s got so much else on, so I ought to be pleased if she can manage to practice for an hour a week” mentality. On reflection, I just can’t see how this works, and we are deceiving our pupils if we fall into the trap of allowing them to believe that ‘not much practice’ is okay. On the other hand, half an hour a day + good teaching will ensure excellent progress; personally, I’d read that as a bare minimum.

[As an after-thought, I did some sums. We currently teach 208 music lessons each week. If each pupil practised for half an hour a day, that would generate 104 hours of practice every day; with 12 practice rooms available in our wonderful new music department, that would guarantee full use of each one from 8.45 until 5.30 every day. That would be amazing!]

Sight read no jumps

I was fortunate enough to gain a place as a chorister in a parish church at the age of eight, and received five years of the most wonderful musical training. In fact, there was a series of very specific tests which we were expected to work through, and success was rewarded with a coloured drawing pin on a chart. Wow! (Actually, I was hooked from day one!)

stMary's1980

More specifically, there were 7 blue, 15 red, 5 green and 5 purple tests. The blue ones were along the lines of ‘read a hymn’ (Immortal, invisible, God only wise,
In light inaccessible hid from our eyes!), sing a scale G to G etc – all things which a seven/eight year old needed to get to grips with if he was going to progress to becoming a ‘full chorister.’ It was a very simple system, but the tests became increasingly demanding – I can’t remember what any of the purple ones were, but they were probably along the lines of ‘process down the nave of the church with a candle in one hand, whilst sight-reading the alto line of Stanford in G with the music upside down!’

However, I do remember several red ones, including ‘sight-read no jumps’. Our assistant choirmaster, Mr Baker, would draw a stave, a treble clef, and a major scale from middle C to top G, on the back of a scrap of paper. All that was required was to be able to sing up and down the scale, by step, as he pointed to each note, but changing direction occasionally. The aural equivalent of going up or down a ladder, one rung at a time. Looking back, we must have learned

  • the ‘sound world’ of the major scale
  • where the tones and semitones were
  • that next door notes move either from line to space, or from space to line

Not too tricky once you got the hang of it, but nevertheless something which needed practise and familiarity. Sight-read jumps, on the other hand, was fiendish, and the test board, all neatly organised in rows and columns, had a notably empty column under this heading – the few boys with a red drawing pin at this point were held in great esteem, and quite rightly! In short, if you can do this, you can do anything, and I do mean that quite sincerely.

Sight read no jumps is not difficult, but I believe that it is necessary for all musicians to practise it and master it. I regularly encounter young musicians (and also older ones) who quite simply can’t sing from one note to the next. I find it difficult to allow them to justify why not – scales are the alphabet which we work with, and we must have a basic working knowledge of the scale. They might not like it, but when I ask my piano pupils to sing a musical line in lessons, they know that I’m serious and they just get on with it. After all, the ears need just as much training as the fingers.

Are you answering the right question?

According to Daniel Kahneman, when posed with a difficult question, we can have a tendency to substitute an easier question and answer that one instead. Without noticing!

questionmarkIf that sounds unlikely, consider the way in which some children tackle their music practice. “I still can’t play this section, so what am I going to do to solve the problem? I know, I’ll practise it slowly (like my teacher has told me to!)” This student might be praised for having a considered approach to his practice, and also for following his teacher’s advice. The trouble is, if as a pianist he has chosen poor fingering which really doesn’t work, no amount of slow practice is going to solve the problem. Sadly, what he has actually done is find a much easier answer to the wrong question.

I have written before on the subject of developing an enquiring mind, which I believe to be vital if our pupils are ultimately to stand on their own two feet as musicians. To practise effectively, students need to learn not only to ask questions, but to ask the right questions, time and time again.

I find it helpful to consider all of the potential decisions into an imaginary flow chart, which might include questions such as:

  • Does this passage need work?
  • Where exactly is it going wrong?
  • What, exactly, is the problem – wrong note, technical issue etc
  • Can I try something different?
  • Does this new method make it better, worse, no difference?
  • Have I fixed the problem now, or do I need to find some more questions?

The point is that just one question – “is it getting better?” – is not enough. The right question is “how do I improve it?” – this question has the potential to generate many more questions and even more answers. And it takes ‘effortful mental activity’  (‘system 2’ thinking) to ask these, and even more of the same to ensure that the correct solutions are pursued. Our pupils need to realise that the decision-making required here is constant, and we need to be modelling this for them constantly too. In short, practice is demanding, but with this degree of purposefulness it can also be extremely rewarding.

We need to teach our pupils to think like this. I often tell my pupils that I consider that my role is to teach them to think, not to play the piano! That’s not strictly true, but actually the ability to think for themselves will be far more helpful to them than just knowing how to play a piece of music. How much do they gain if I, the teacher, am the one who has worked out for them how to solve all of the potential difficulties along the way? Very little I think. Once a student knows how to make constructive decisions which can guide their practice so that it is productive, they will fly –  and not just in their musical studies but in everything, since these skills are of course transferable. And we are being told that Music is not an ‘academic’ subject – how ridiculous.

British Kodály Academy Spring Course

From 2-5 April this year, the British Kodály Academy will be holding its annual Spring Course. There is a wealth on information on their website, which this year is aimed specifically at conductors and singers. 4 April includes a concert given by the London Adventist Chorale. I attended the course two years ago, and for me the daily musicianship lessons were the undoubtedly the highlight. The Hungarian tutors in particular bring a very different view to musicianship training than anything which I have seen before, and those few days not only inspired the tone deaf project and the Choir who can’t sing, but have had a long lasting effect on all aspect of my teaching ever since.

BKAI am a huge fan of the Kodály Method, at the centre of which is an emphasis on the development of our inner hearing; that is, the ability to hear notes or music inside our heads without the need to play or sing.

When I first learned to read, I remember very well having to say the words out loud as I read them. My twin sister, on the other hand, had by this stage already learned to read the words silently in her head. [She was also way ahead of me when it came to tying shoelaces!] At the time this was a difficult concept for me to get to grips with, and I had genuine difficulty in believe that she could actually read in this way! Now, with years of practice behind me, and like many other people, I guess I take it for granted.

Read this sentence out loud: “It ought to be no surprise to you that, on reading this sentence out loud, it sounds just the same as how it sounds in your head when you read it silently.” Now imagine how strange it would be if you didn’t actually know what the words sounded like until you read them out loud.

But this is exactly what many students do when it comes to music – they have little or no idea what the notes will sound like until their instrument produces the sound for them. For me, this is all the wrong way around! The instrumentalist should be able to look at the score and be able to hear the sounds on the page – and then when they play, the notes which sound come as confirmation of what they expected, and not as a complete surprise: “Oh, that’s what it sounds like!”

The implications of this are far-reaching. How does a violinist know whether she is playing in tune if she has no idea of what pitches she should actually be playing? Without inner hearing, she has no point of reference. How does a student know, when he is learning a new piece of music, whether he is playing it right or not? If his only point of reference is having his fingers in the right place, where is the musician in this process?

I guess the big question is this: Would you like to be able to look at a piece of music and be able to hear it, inside your head, in the same way as you can with words? If the answer is yes, then a Kodály course is for you! This is a skill which can be learned, in just the same way as we learn to read silently. Not in five minutes, or even five days, but it is something which our young musicians should be learning, and can learn – all of them. And even some older ones too. It isn’t a mystery, or some gift which some have and others don’t – it is a skill which comes as a result of some serious hard graft and determination. It is also, in my opinion, the best skill which any musician can possess. And it is, of course, empowering.